My best friend sent this to me last night. I thought it was hilarious, so I just had to share. No offense, ladies.

by Ryan Parman • March 9, 2005 • Just for Fun • 5 comments
My best friend sent this to me last night. I thought it was hilarious, so I just had to share. No offense, ladies.

Ryan Parman is an entrepreneur, open source evangelist and passionate usability advocate currently living in Seattle. He is the founder and visionary behind SimplePie and CloudFusion, co-founder of WarpShare, member of the RSS Advisory Board, and creator of the AWS SDK for PHP. Ryan's aptly-named blog, Flailing Wildly, is where he writes about ideas longer than 140 characters.
thanks,
i knew there was mathmatical science behind the feeling. now i know i am not alone.
April 15, 2005
I must say as a math major that your proof is incorrect. anecdotally I’ve found quite frequently that girls themselves are not evil but loving them seems to be.
money is not equal to time. money is proportional to time. i.e T=C*$
the constant C is important. now the proverb “money is the root of all evil” is actually a mis-quote of a certain 1st century Christian theologian. the proposition is that the LOVE of money is A root of all kinds of evil. so what we have here by substition:
t = C*$
Girls = t*$
therefore Girls = C$^2
we add “the love of” two both sides of the equation to get
the love of girls = love of C$^2
but since the love of money is a root of evil,
the love of girls = love of C*sqrt(all kinds of evil^2)
which easily simplifies to
the love of girls = constant love of all kinds of evil.
no apologies. when theology, experience, and mathmatics all agree, who am I to argue?
April 29, 2005
well, technically speaking, through cancellation wouldn’t your theory also mean that:
love of girls = constant love of all kinds of evil.
cancel “love of” and cite the real quote well (without “kinds of” because I doubt that a 1st Century text would use those words, making it more like “the excessive love for money is a source of evil”):
girls = constant evil (through cancellation)
therefore… proving the original mathematical sequence of events correct?
May 1, 2005
Not to mention the fact that “and” implies addition, “of” implies multiplication… so girls “require” time and money would be more accurately represented as “Girls = Time + Money”…
Comments for this post are now closed.
All ideas, opinions and comments I post are my own and are in no way affiliated with anybody I work with. If you quote and/or reprint something I've written or said, please direct folks back to this site as a form of attribution. I promise I'll do the same for you. Unless otherwise noted, all content on this site is copyright © 1979–2011 Ryan Parman.
Powered by Rocket Sauce. A Ryan Parman production.
Jalada
March 9, 2005
I’ve seen the same for the Teletubbies.
The Teletubbies were made by the BBC which cost the time and money:
Teletubbies = Time x Money
And so on! Heh.